Monday, February 15, 2010

MP crazies go over the line.

I'm still busy with basketball. But I do need to refute something posted by MP or his nutcase crew. One of the gang posted "my" name, address, phone number,etc on our blog. Of course, the information was incorrect in all aspects. I have no idea who they are talking about. So, my friends, you see what MP and his fellow crazies are capable of. What they did was illegal, of course; but apparently these MP losers don't care.

27 comments:

  1. How funny; on this post:

    http://wdtprs.com/blog/2006/03/a-bishops-antidote-to-the-cancer-of-the-cantor/

    ...someone by the name of John Haynes rants on about Mozart, just as you do on this blog. Isn't that interesting, Mr. Haynes?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Slattery’s vicious attacks on the Church’s magnificent musical tradition , Mozart, for example, show his ignorance and lack of refinement But what can we expect from his background. Of course, you will not ‘print’ this. One page of Mozart brings us closer to God than all of the Bishop’s ranting.

    Comment by john haynes — 23 March 2006 @ 8:20 pm

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you the same Brankin [crony of Slattery} who suggested I insult my 3 year old grandson by refusing to eat a piece of his birthday cake because it was cooked. You have advised men not to eat anything cooked during Lent. You take Slattery, I’ll take Mozart. Would you do the same to your==o excuse me, you would have no grandchildren. Love this site. Tells you what’s lurking out there.

    Comment by john haynes — 1 April 2006 @ 11:11 pm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Man, there are REAL CRAZIES out there. I hope you aren't pestering the poor man whose name you posted. Waiting for apology???Are you going to "man up" or are you afraid.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Look, it's very obvious. Both of your blogs use the John H name, and one of them is about Tulsa. I can't see someone using a name of a stranger for their blog, and writing about experiences in a city they claim to not live in (yet on a blog does claim to be a native of that city).

    Now come on. You aren't "Mark." Everyone knows it. This isn't rocket science.

    You need to work on that forgiveness idea.

    Please find a way to come to peace with it all. It would be so worthwhile.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think any of Jack's personalities know of the existence of the others. "Mark" is one of the sex obsessed teenager personalities. He seems to be dominant at the moment. John Haynes, the host body, is an old man.

    ReplyDelete
  7. if you go to his profile you see that he is using the email "flickafan@aol.com"

    a little easy internet searching finds that a John Haynes in Tulsa, OK owns that email address.

    And about a quarter of the way down THIS PAGE he posts a comment under the name John Haynes and lists the email address (flickafan@aol.com) that is tied to the profile on this page.

    (Hi John! We know who you are now.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Got screenshots of it all too, before the comments come down.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Personally, I think someone is jealous of the success of two other bloggers. I think that is the motivation behind all the nastiness on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sherlock: I got a screenshot of his profile with email address open a couple of hours ago.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Does Mr. Haynes have a Facebook account? Let's go look for that too.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No facebook account---sorry. But maybe you can find another person with our names and act like you have done something.

    ReplyDelete
  13. There is apparently no other John Haynes of Tulsa, OK that uses your email address.

    Does he know what you're doing?

    ReplyDelete
  14. sHagger trolling as "THE PROF" (caps, yet!), now? No end to the delusions of grandeur? So what's with the link to St Francis's (not St Francis much longer - eh, sHagger?) Laureate psychiatric health systems? And, while we're throwing stones, haven't we've racked up one or two (be honest - three or four) of the listed disorders between our own disturbed personalities?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I suspect MP is doing a good deal of the "Anon" stuff.And, of course, his cult('community')could be racing to his "rescue." Look for MP to make a new appeal for the hard cash. Typical cyber scam.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Don't think the "Anon" stuff is Himself's style, Mark, but Oofty could be on to something where THE PROF is concerned.

    sHagger!!

    Re another of your posts, I have the highest regard for Mark Harris, as well as for Mimi. You do seem to have a difficult-to-understand fondness for the scatter-shot approach.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lapinbizzare, I really only follow 3 blogs.

    I once went to Mark Harris for the names of some Anglican blogers. It was to help some others. The MP crowd trashed me on his blog. I responded. He erased my comments but left on the blogs trashing me and my family. I call such activity unworthy of a decent man, much less a supposed "man of the cloth." That's why I have no respect for him.

    Same with threats from Mimi, and many of MP's 'community.'

    I have kids, grandkids, and friends--all of whom are trashed by the MP crowd. See why I joined the above as RC's

    I assume you know the MP crowd and MP himself engage in a bad form of character assassination. And are free with the lies.

    I am very hostile to the RC hierarchy as those who check my blog know. But the laity are nice. I am embarrassed for my family and friends to see the antics of the Anglican bloggers. There conduct is disgraceful--Harris, MP, and the lot.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Notice that Mark/John is playing the injured innocent here. He's not saying WHY he got trashed on MP's blog. Why don't you ask him about that, Lapin?

    Not that he's likely to tell you the truth, if he can't own up to his own name.

    ReplyDelete
  19. It was something to do with (in theory) two young men and sexuality, if I remember correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hey, dummy look down at "Who might need Help." You'll find your answer there. You need to spend more time checking before you blow your mouth.

    But typical MP a.. kisser.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Having better things to do with my time, Anon, than to slavishly follow every rag-tag blog around, I haven't a clue why - though in fairness to Mark, since when has guilt been a prerequisite for getting trashed at "Of Course I Must Be Right"?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Since apparently you weren't there Lapin, you need to just stay out of it completely.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Could give a flying fornication what trolling paranoids who post as Anonymous, think, Anonymous. My question since when has guilt been a prerequisite for getting trashed at Of Course I Must Be Right? is, since you seem not to have noticed, wholly independent of the issue of what Mark may or may not have said.

    ReplyDelete
  24. By the comments from "anon" it is clear "anon" was not there, or to be blunt; "anon" is a scam artist supporter.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Nope; I was there. I just didn't think it was a situation worth burning into my memory.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I know where you're going to end up, John. I've seen another blogger (a Canadian who is of a different denomination) go through this already, and he's been at it for 20 years. He actually pickets the church where he says a minister abused him. Good thing you're not in England, isn't it, or else you'd stalk MP in real life, wouldn't you?

    This Canadian blogger of whom I speak has wasted 20 years - the denomination that he has his complaint against has refused to hear his grievances because the minister who theoretically abused him already apologized but Canadian Blogger refused to accept it. If Canadian Blogger gets any comments on his blog, it is usually people telling him to get a life and that is all.

    Other than that, his membership in that church has been revoked, no one comes to his blog, most other bloggers of his denomination have to force him to stay on topic when he comments or be kicked off...

    Is this what you want to come to?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Which "Anonymous" posted the latest self-serving, sanctimonious twaddle, I wonder? Someone glib and well-versed in the misdoings of others, it seems. Who, I wonder, might that be? Yet another round in the mote and beam marathon?

    ReplyDelete